
Oh, yeah, come all ye faithful reproducers of sonic phenomena. Just glanced through this article, The Death of High Fidelity while I was researching the foibles of mixing specifically for the mp3 format.
I had just bounced down a few recent changes in my current roster of songs, and was giving them a listen on the open-air Bose speakers (note1) and was surprised by what got buried v. what got emphasized. Part of this, of course, is my own lack of skills at mixing. But part of it isn’t …
Anyway, interesting to hear of the current pressures on producers and engineers to mix for the overcompressed-mp3-plus-crappy-laptop-speakers, since this is now the standard state of listening affairs for a good chunk of the crowd out there. I don’t yet know what I think about that, since it’s the old artistic-ideal-vs.-commercial-reality conundrum, and i have heard similar arguments about the compression for normal radio airplay, but for this latter there was always a radio.edit different from the studio album version, so that the sonic quality was optimized for each different scenario.
The truth is, I tend to like the modern– well, 90’s and 2000’s era– productions. I think that we have a vast amount of technology and knowledge that tweaks our aural perception, and i find many albums today a resplendent soundscape. Granted, I listen to a lot of Nine Inch Nails and Radiohead, two bands who have invested a lot of studio time in creating sounds and atmospheres; but I do get a bit of the younger bands unnamed but implied in the article, both from my own passions and research, and from catching echoes of the adolescent frenzy of my daughter, 16 years old and everything that tends to mean. And truth is, as John Oswald says, the world is a noisy ball. You have to shout sometimes to be heard. But then you have bands like Low, like Sigur Ros, like Kings of Convenience, and like the Black Atlantic (my recent late-night addiction): bands who swim only in the soft, the meditative, the glacial, and/or bands whose whole ethic is dynamics, meaning the softest softs and comparative ‘louds’ that are an orgasm’s release of tension. So I don’t know. On this, I am agnostic.
Meanwhile, the practical side is that I have to make sure that these songs, being built in an incremental recording process that is all I can afford right now, sound good on an mp3 as well as full-fledged CD audio aiffs. I will overcompress where I have to. I am not afraid.
1: I have heard the discussion on the relative merits of Bose speakers, starting from one audiophile telling me they were crap, but with the greatest
PR the speaker industry has ever known — this was several years ago. Later, I read through a few articles that said Bose sells their “sound” in the store on sheer volume (and humans perceive, to a given threshold, louder things as sounding ‘better’, more impacting) (among other nasty things). In any case, I am not yet able to be a discerning speaker man, time and funds as stumbling blocks. I do however have the innate gift of inheriting material objects, and I did get a nice Bose speaker set from my brother-in-law’s audio cast-offs, and as a beggar I am not choosy. However, I will admit to a stark sense of disappointment in the sound quality — it has the strangest frequency response of any speaker I have spent time with in my humble career. I compare them daily with the sound of my Sennheiser headphones — potent, righteous, and true headphones, though they squeeze the head somethin’ awful– and the Bose come up lacking again and again.